Here Designs

How to Build Backlinks for Beginners: A Simple Step-by-Step Guide

Stuck at zero backlinks? The first links are the hardest—and they rarely come from the tactics you read about. Here's what actually moved the needle for a site that sat at zero for five months.

How to Build Backlinks for Beginners: A Simple Step-by-Step Guide

Someone emails you: "I'll build you 500 backlinks for $50." You delete it. Good instinct.

Then you open a backlink checker, paste your domain, and see the number 0 under referring domains. That email starts looking less like a scam and more like a temptation. I know, because my first real site sat at zero for almost five months. I'd written 34 articles. I had traffic from exactly one channel: Google Discover, which is basically a slot machine. No links meant no foundation under the site, and I didn't understand that yet.

Here's what nobody tells beginners in how to build backlinks: the first links are the hardest, and they almost never come from the tactics you read about first. Let me show you what actually moved the needle for me.

Key takeaways

  • A backlink is any external link pointing to your site, and Google treats it as a signal of trust — but only if the linking page is relevant and has its own traffic.
  • Your first 10 links should come from people who already know you: clients, partners, communities, directory listings with real editorial standards.
  • Paid link schemes and private blog networks can get your site demoted. The risk is not theoretical.
  • Judging link quality takes five minutes: check the referring domain's rating, its topical fit, and whether the link is dofollow.
  • Guest posting still works, but only on sites with an actual audience. A link on a dead blog is worth nothing.

A backlink is a link on someone else's website that points to yours. That's it. The confusion starts when people treat all links as equal.

They aren't. Google's ranking systems weigh each link by the authority of the page it sits on, the relevance of that page to your topic, and whether the link is followed or marked nofollow. A single link from a respected site in your niche can outperform 200 links from random directories. I learned this the expensive way: in my early months I submitted my site to roughly 60 free directories. Three years later, those links have sent me a combined 11 visitors. Total.

The three criteria that actually matter

When you evaluate a potential link, ask three questions in this order:

  1. Relevance. Does the linking page talk about your subject? A link from a cooking blog to your SaaS comparison tool is noise.
  2. The referring domain's strength. Tools like Ahrefs, Semrush, or Moz give this a number — Domain Rating, Authority Score, whatever the label. Anything below 10 rarely moves anything.
  3. Traffic on the linking page. This is the one beginners skip. A page with a high domain rating but zero organic visitors passes almost no value, because nobody clicks the link and Google sees no engagement.

Notice what's missing from that list: anchor text tricks, link velocity, exact-match keywords. Those matter at scale, not when you're trying to get your first twenty links.

Free backlink checkers exist and they're fine for a beginner. Ahrefs Webmaster Tools gives you a solid snapshot of your own site at no cost. Semrush has a limited free tier. Google Search Console shows you who links to you, though with a delay of a few days.

How to use a backlink checker without drowning in data

The trap is looking at the wrong metric. Beginners stare at total backlinks. Look at referring domains instead — the number of distinct sites linking to you. Ten links from one site is one vote, not ten.

What to check on a competitor

I do this every time I enter a new niche, and it takes me about twenty minutes:

  • Paste a competitor's domain into the tool and sort referring domains by strength, not by date.
  • Filter for pages that link to several competitors but not to you. Those are your warmest prospects.
  • Open the strongest ones manually and check whether they still publish, and whether their content overlaps yours.
  • Skip anything that looks like a link farm: generic domains, no author names, thin articles, ads everywhere.

The last point saves you hours. Roughly a third of the "opportunities" any tool surfaces are pages that exist purely to sell links. You can usually spot them in ten seconds.

Free tactics that work when you have no budget and no reputation

The uncomfortable truth about free link building: it's slow, it's manual, and most of it is email. There's no shortcut around the email.

Free tactics that work when you have no budget and no reputation

Start with people who already know you

This is the fastest path and almost nobody does it. If you run a business, your suppliers, clients, and partners have websites. Ask them for a mention. I got my first three links this way — one from a client who put us in their "tools we use" page, one from a supplier's case study, one from a local business association. None of those pages had high authority, but they were real, relevant, and free.

Guest posting without wasting your time

Guest posting means writing an article for someone else's site in exchange for an author bio with a link. It still works. What doesn't work is pitching sites that accept anything.

My filter: if the site publishes fewer than two posts a month, skip it. If the last five posts are all guest posts with the same generic tone, skip it. If the editor replies within 24 hours saying "sure, send it," that's usually a warning sign, not a green light. Real editorial standards mean real value.

Expect a response rate around one in ten on cold pitches. I sent 42 pitches over two months to land four placements. That's a normal result, and it felt like failure at the time.

Find a page on a reputable site that links to a resource which no longer exists — a 404. Then email the site owner, tell them the link is broken, and suggest your own page as a replacement if it genuinely covers the topic.

It works because you're doing them a favor. It also takes patience: I average one successful replacement per fifteen emails. On one occasion the webmaster replied thanking me, and it turned out he'd been meaning to fix that page for two years.

Buying links violates Google's spam policies. The consequence isn't a slap on the wrist — it's a manual action that can strip your rankings for months, and recovering requires a reconsideration request that often fails.

Paid links, PBNs, and the links you should refuse

I've watched two people in my network try it. One bought a package of 30 links from a marketplace; his traffic dropped about 60% within roughly two months and took the better part of a year to return after he disavowed everything. The other used a private blog network and never got caught. That second story is the dangerous one, because it makes the gamble look survivable.

Links to walk away from, every time:

  • Anything sold through a marketplace with a price list.
  • Private blog networks — networks of sites built only to host links.
  • Mass reciprocal exchanges ("you link to me, I link to 40 people").
  • Comment spam and forum signatures. Waste of time and a pattern Google recognizes.

Comparing your realistic options

Here's how the main beginner tactics stack up when you have no budget and no audience yet.

Tactic Time to first link Cost Risk Realistic output in 6 months
Asking existing contacts 1–3 weeks Free None 3–8 links
Guest posting 4–10 weeks Free, costs writing time None 4–10 links
Broken link building 2–6 weeks Free None 2–6 links
Directory submissions Days Free Low, if you pick real directories 1–3 links worth having
Buying links Days $50–$500+ High — manual penalty possible Negative

The table is deliberately unflattering. Six months of honest work gets you somewhere between ten and twenty-five decent links. That's enough to see movement in competitive niches, and it's roughly where my own site stood before things shifted.

Questions beginners keep asking

Start with the people already in your orbit and with communities you participate in. A well-argued answer on a forum where your expertise is relevant can earn a link, but only if you've contributed there for a while. Drive-by self-promotion gets removed. Beyond that, guest posting on small but legitimate niche sites is your main free channel for the first year.

Yes, just less. A nofollow link doesn't pass ranking authority in the traditional sense, but it still sends referral traffic, and Google has said nofollow is treated as a hint rather than a rule. A nofollow link from a respected site in your field is worth having. Don't chase it, don't refuse it.

There's no number. It depends entirely on who you're competing against. In a narrow local niche, five relevant links can be enough. In a broad commercial category, you might be looking at hundreds before you crack the top ten. Compare your referring domains to the sites currently ranking for your target phrase, and aim to close the gap gradually rather than match it overnight.

The part that actually matters

Every tactic above has the same underlying mechanic: you have to give someone a reason to link. A useful tool, a number nobody else published, a clear explanation of something confusing, a fix for a broken resource. Without that, outreach is just begging with extra steps.

My most-linked page isn't the one I optimized hardest. It's a 900-word explainer I wrote in one afternoon because I was annoyed that every existing answer was vague. It now has more referring domains than the rest of the site combined, and I've never once pitched it to anyone.

So the question worth sitting with isn't "how do I get links." It's "what could I publish that someone else would feel slightly worse off for not citing?" Answer that honestly, and the rest gets easier. Answer it lazily, and no amount of outreach will save you.

Keith Ashford

Keith Ashford is a content strategist and SEO specialist who helps brands build sustainable organic growth through meticulous keyword research, sharp on-page optimization, and thoughtful content strategy. He is known for designing topic clusters and pillar pages that turn scattered ideas into coherent, authoritative resources. His approach blends data-driven analysis with a genuine commitment to clarity, making his work as readable as it is effective.

See all articles →

Related articles